Canon EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M) vs Canon EOS M5

Placeholder
Canon EOS M5

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M)

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M5

Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,620k dots
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

competitors

Canon EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M) Competitors

Placeholder

Canon EOS R

Boutique

$2,199 - $2,299

Focus points Many more focus points
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$398 - $448 body only

$490 - $498 with 16-50mm lens

Lens availability Significantly more lenses available
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D

Entry-level DSLR

$788 - $999 body only

$942 - $1,049 with 18-55mm lens

Lens availability Much more lenses available
Battery life Much longer battery life
Size Significantly larger

Canon EOS M5 Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$549 body only

$539 - $1,335 with 18-55mm lens

Lens availability Much more lenses available
Viewfinder Has an optical viewfinder
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$747 - $748 body only

$811 - $848 with 16-50mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Focus points Significantly more focus points
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony A7

Sony A7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$798 body only

$998 with 28-70mm lens

Lens availability Much more lenses available
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Placeholder
EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M)
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS M5
EOS M5
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments