Sony NEX 5N vs Canon EOS M

Winner
Sony NEX-5N

113

Canon EOS M

89

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony NEX 5N

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
1,079 ISO
Great image quality
Overall image quality
77.0
Great color depth
Color depth
23.6 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
12.7 EV
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS M.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony NEX-5N.

competitors

Sony NEX-5N Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$450 - $498 body only

$579 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen
Sony NEX 5R

Sony NEX 5R

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$399 body only

Focus points More focus points
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$899 body only

$999 with 16-50mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life

Canon EOS M Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Low light performance Much more noise at high ISO
Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$401 - $429 body only

$532 with 15-45mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Size Larger
Canon Rebel SL1

Canon Rebel SL1

Entry-level DSLR

$554 body only

$415 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Overall image quality Much worse image quality

discussion

Sony NEX-5N
NEX 5N
Sony

Report a correction
Canon EOS M
EOS M
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments