Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Canon EOS M

Winner
Olympus XZ-2 iHS

69

Canon EOS M

44

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M

Size
Really small
Compact (109×66×32 mm)
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS M.
Explore our gallery of 37 sample photos taken by the Olympus XZ-2 iHS.

competitors

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Pro digicam

$650 - $698

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Color depth Better color depth
Size Much larger
Nikon D80

Nikon D80

Entry-level DSLR

$800 body only

$305 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Much better image quality
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Pro digicam

$302

Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Slightly smaller
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

Canon EOS M Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$385 - $429 body only

$450 with 15-45mm lens

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Color depth Better color depth
Size Slightly larger
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$445 - $448 body only

$470 - $498 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Touch screen No touch screen

discussion

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
XZ-2 iHS
Olympus

Report a correction
Canon EOS M
EOS M
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments