Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Canon EOS M

Winner
Olympus XZ-2 iHS

64

Canon EOS M

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M

Size
Really small
Compact (109×66×32 mm)
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS M.
Explore our gallery of 37 sample photos taken by the Olympus XZ-2 iHS.

competitors

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Competitors

Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1

Pro digicam

$206

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Size Slightly smaller
Overall image quality Worse image quality
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$699

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Color depth Better color depth
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Pro digicam

$291

Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Slightly smaller
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

Canon EOS M Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$439 - $449 with 15-45mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$399 - $479 body only

$529 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Slightly larger
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$378 body only

$448 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Better image quality
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

discussion

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
XZ-2 iHS
Olympus

Report a correction
Canon EOS M
EOS M
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments