Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Canon EOS M

Winner
Olympus XZ-2 iHS

69

Canon EOS M

44

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M

Size
Really small
Compact (109×66×32 mm)
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS M.
Explore our gallery of 37 sample photos taken by the Olympus XZ-2 iHS.

competitors

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$448

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Color depth Better color depth
Touch screen No touch screen
Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1

Pro digicam

$206

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Size Slightly smaller
Overall image quality Significantly worse image quality
Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Boutique

$649

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Overall image quality Better image quality
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

Canon EOS M Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$415 - $429 body only

$549 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Slightly larger
Canon EOS M5

Canon EOS M5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$943 - $979 body only

$1,056 - $1,099 with 15-45mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger

discussion

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
XZ-2 iHS
Olympus

Report a correction
Canon EOS M
EOS M
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments