Canon EOS M vs Fujifilm X-M1

Canon EOS M
Fujifilm X-M1

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Really small
Size
Compact (109×66×32 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-M1

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Size
Really small
Mid size (117×67×39 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.5"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS M.
Explore our gallery of 40 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-M1.

competitors

Canon EOS M Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$435 - $679 body only

$549 with 18-55mm lens

Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Size Larger
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$437 body only

$379 - $399 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen

Fujifilm X-M1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-E1

Fujifilm X-E1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$380 body only

$689 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen size Much smaller screen
Fujifilm X-A2

Fujifilm X-A2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$492 body only

$495 with 16-50mm lens

Battery life Longer battery life
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Fujifilm X-A1

Fujifilm X-A1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$329 body only

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Continuous shooting Shoots slower

discussion

Canon EOS M
EOS M
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-M1
X-M1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments