vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
Touch screen
Touch screen
Less buttons
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-M1

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon EOS M

Report a correction
External mic jack Has an external mic jack Yes vs No
Help
Record high quality audio with an external microphone
Touch screen Has a touch screen Yes vs No
Help
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 1,040k dots vs 920k dots
Help
More than 10% higher resolution screen
True resolution Higher true resolution 17.9 MP vs 16 MP
Help
Capture more than 10% more detail in your photos
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
Help
The EOS M's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
Size Smaller 109x66x32 mm vs 117x67x39 mm
Help
More than 20% smaller
Thickness Thinner 1.3" vs 1.5"
Help
Around 20% thinner
Lowest price Cheaper $298.00 vs $499.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $201 cheaper (more than 40% less)
Weight Slightly lighter 298 g vs 330 g
Help
Around 10% lighter
Canon EOS M Learn more about
the Canon EOS M

Advantages of the Fujifilm X-M1

Report a correction
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag 381 ms vs 742 ms
Help
Around 50% less delay when taking photos
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen Yes vs No
Help
Flip-out screens can be helpful when composing tricky shots or taking movies
Startup delay Significantly less startup delay 1700 ms vs 2700 ms
Help
Around 40% less delay when turning on
Battery life Significantly longer battery life 350 shots vs 230 shots
Help
More than 50% more shots per battery charge
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 10 fps vs 4.3 fps
Help
Around 2.5x faster continuous shooting
Focus points More focus points 49 vs 31
Help
Set focus accurately within the frame
Lens availability Slightly more lenses available 8 lenses vs 4 lenses
Help
2x more lenses available
Built-in flash Built-in flash Yes vs No
Help
A built-in flash is useful for taking indoor shots where there is little light
Sensor size Slightly larger sensor APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm
Help
More than 10% larger sensor
Fujifilm X-M1 Learn more about
the Fujifilm X-M1
vs

recommendations

Snapsort can't make a recommendation (yet) because it doesn't have enough data yet about the Fujifilm X-M1.

similarities

Compared to recent mirrorless cameras

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Sensor cleaning Self cleaning sensors Help
Avoids dust in your photos
External flash Each supports an external flash Help
Better lighting
Fastest shutter speed Slow max shutter speed Help
1/4000 of a second
Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
You could stitch photos in post
Shutter lag Significant shutter lag Help
EOS M:742 ms
X-M1:381 ms
Lens availability Few lenses available Help
EOS M:4 lenses
X-M1:8 lenses
Startup delay Significant startup delay Help
EOS M:2700 ms
X-M1:1700 ms
Viewfinder No viewfinders Help
Can only preview photos on the screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur

dxomark

DXOMark

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$598 body only

$748 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Is slightly less noisy at high ISO
Overall image quality Has significantly better image quality
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Thickness Is thicker
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$438 - $448 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Is slightly less noisy at high ISO
Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
External flash Doesn't support an external flash
Sensor cleaning Lacks a self cleaning sensor
Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$488 - $749 with 18-55mm lens

Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
Thickness Is thicker
Screen resolution Has a slightly lower resolution screen
Sony Alpha NEX-6

Sony Alpha NEX-6

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$399 - $748 body only

$500 - $779 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Thickness Is thicker
Size Is slightly larger
Sony NEX-5T

Sony NEX-5T

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$348 body only

$498 - $500 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
Color depth Has slightly more color depth
Thickness Is thicker
Olympus PEN E-PL5

Olympus PEN E-PL5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$470 with 14-42mm lens

Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
Image stabilization Has image stabilization
Sensor size Has a marginally smaller sensor
HDR Lacks a built in HDR feature
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$329 - $567 body only

$477 with 18-55mm lens

Low light performance Is slightly less noisy at high ISO
Overall image quality Has significantly better image quality
Thickness Is thicker
Weight Is significantly heavier

Canon EOS M Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$499 - $774 body only

$200 - $729 with 18-55mm lens

Lens availability Much more lenses available
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Autofocus Lacks video autofocus
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR
Canon Rebel SL1

Canon Rebel SL1

Entry-level DSLR

$499 - $600 body only

$599 - $650 with 18-55mm lens

Lens availability Much more lenses available
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Size Much larger
Color depth Worse color depth
Nikon 1 J3

Nikon 1 J3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$358 with 10-30mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Color depth Worse color depth
Low light performance More noise at high ISO
Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX2000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$250 - $309 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Dynamic range More dynamic range
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Focus points Slightly fewer focus points
Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16

Pro digicam

$499

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Low light performance More noise at high ISO
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only

Fujifilm X-M1 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Fujifilm X-A1

Fujifilm X-A1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Startup delay Significantly less startup delay
Shutter lag More shutter lag
Sensor cleaning Lacks a self cleaning sensor
Fujifilm X-E1

Fujifilm X-E1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $499 body only

$1,140 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Fujifilm X-E2

Fujifilm X-E2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$799 - $800 body only

$1,149 - $1,199 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly slower
Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Pro digicam

$619

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Olympus OM-D E-M10

Olympus OM-D E-M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$693 - $699 body only

$793 - $799 with 14-42mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Sensor size Smaller sensor
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

appearance

Canon EOS M Fujifilm X-M1
Canon EOS M Fujifilm X-M1
Canon EOS M

discussion

Canon EOS M
EOS M
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-M1
X-M1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments