Canon EOS 60D vs Canon EOS M

Winner
Canon EOS 60D

49

Canon EOS M

44

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 60D

Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
400 ms startup delay
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
253 ms shutter lag
Slightly more lenses available
Lens availability
220 lenses
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M

Size
Really small
Compact (109×66×32 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Thickness
Thin
1.3"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS M.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 60D.

competitors

Canon EOS 60D Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$421 - $649 body only

$540 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Smaller
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life
Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D

Entry-level DSLR

$1,099 body only

$1,149 with 18-55mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
Canon EOS 7D

Canon EOS 7D

Pro DSLR

$849 body only

$1,119 with 18-200mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Viewfinder coverage Much better viewfinder coverage
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Canon EOS M Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$417 - $429 body only

$549 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Slightly larger
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$515 body only

$743 with 18-55mm lens

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Startup delay Much less startup delay
Size Significantly larger

discussion

Canon EOS 60D
EOS 60D
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS M
EOS M
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments