Canon Rebel SL1 vs Canon EOS M

Winner
Canon Rebel SL1

54

Canon EOS M

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel SL1

Slightly more lenses available
Lens availability
220 lenses
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Pentamirror
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M

Size
Really small
Compact (109×66×32 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Weight
Light-weight
298 g
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS M.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel SL1.

competitors

Canon Rebel SL1 Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$328 - $649 body only

$349 - $449 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$431 - $649 body only

$535 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Size Larger
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$325 body only

$350 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

Canon EOS M Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$410 - $429 body only

$599 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Slightly larger
Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX 5N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$691 body only

$853 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Better image quality
Dynamic range More dynamic range
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Canon Rebel SL1
Rebel SL1
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS M
EOS M
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments