Canon EOS M10 vs Canon EOS M

Winner
Canon EOS M10

98

Canon EOS M

90

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M10

Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Phase detection autofocus
Badge
fast and accurate
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M

Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS M.

competitors

Canon EOS M10 Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$335 - $699 body only

$389 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Lens availability Much more lenses available
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$385 - $429 body only

$450 with 15-45mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Slightly larger
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 - $399 with 16-50mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Lens availability Significantly more lenses available
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen

Canon EOS M Competitors

Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$385 - $429 body only

$450 with 15-45mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Larger
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$446 - $448 body only

$470 - $498 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 - $399 with 16-50mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen

discussion

Canon EOS M10
EOS M10
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS M
EOS M
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments