Canon EOS 70D vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3

Winner
Canon EOS 70D

56

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3

53

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 70D

Slightly more lenses available
Lens availability
220 lenses
Great battery life
Battery life
920 shots
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 60fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 70D.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3.

competitors

Canon EOS 70D Competitors

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$999 - $1,499 body only

$1,330 - $1,899 with 24-105mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Viewfinder size Larger viewfinder
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Canon EOS 60D

Canon EOS 60D

Pro DSLR

$555 body only

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Lowest price Cheaper
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Placeholder

Canon EOS RP

Boutique

$1,299 - $1,699

Focus points Many more focus points
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Much shorter battery life

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 Competitors

Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000

Entry-level DSLR

$602 body only

Built-in focus motor Has a built-in focus motor
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$864 with 14-42mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Smaller
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

discussion

Canon EOS 70D
EOS 70D
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3
Lumix DMC-GH3
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments