Canon EOS 70D vs Fujifilm X-Pro1

Canon EOS 70D
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 70D

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1

Size
Really small
Standard size (140×82×43 mm)
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%
Thickness
Thin
1.7"
Weight
Light-weight
450 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 70D.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-Pro1.

competitors

Canon EOS 70D Competitors

Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D

Entry-level DSLR

$1,099 body only

$481 - $1,499 with 18-135mm lens

Viewfinder coverage Better viewfinder coverage
True resolution Higher true resolution
Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$799 with 18-55mm lens

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Canon EOS Rebel T6s

Canon EOS Rebel T6s

Entry-level DSLR

$1,336 with 3mm lens

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Weather sealed No weather sealing

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,699 body only

$2,299 - $2,300 with 23mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$799 - $999 body only

$1,199 with 18-55mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$525 - $599 body only

$699 - $767 with 16-50mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

discussion

Canon EOS 70D
EOS 70D
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro1
X-Pro1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments