Updated (May 2012): Compare the Canon EOS 650D vs Sony NEX-7

Sony NEX 7 vs Canon EOS 650D

Winner
Sony NEX-7

51

Canon EOS 650D

48

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony NEX 7

Great image quality
Overall image quality
81.0
Really small
Size
Compact (111×59×38 mm)
Great color depth
Color depth
24.1 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
13.4 EV
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 650D

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Lens availability
Slightly more lenses available
220 lenses
Badge
Phase detection autofocus
fast and accurate
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 650D.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony NEX-7.

competitors

Sony NEX-7 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $498 body only

$579 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Focus points Significantly more focus points
Size Slightly larger
Sony Alpha NEX-6

Sony Alpha NEX-6

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$550 body only

Focus points More focus points
Weight Slightly lighter
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,298 body only

$1,446 - $1,746 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Focus points Many more focus points
Size Larger

Canon EOS 650D Competitors

Canon EOS 700D

Canon EOS 700D

Entry-level DSLR

$479 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Canon EOS 600D

Canon EOS 600D

Entry-level DSLR

$446 body only

$510 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon EOS 1200D

Canon EOS 1200D

Entry-level DSLR

$310 body only

Color depth Better color depth
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

discussion

Sony NEX-7
NEX 7
Sony

Report a correction
Canon EOS 650D
EOS 650D
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments