Advantages of the Canon 650D |
 |
|
Much less startup delay |
700 ms |
vs |
2800 ms |
|
4x less delay when turning on |
|
|
 |
|
Has a touch screen |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly more lenses available |
162 lenses |
vs |
92 lenses |
|
Around 80% more lenses available |
|
|
 |
|
Has an optical viewfinder |
Pentamirror |
vs |
Digital |
|
Optical viewfinders save battery life and are more detailed |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly more cross-type focus points |
9 |
vs |
3 |
|
Grab focus in difficult situations |
|
|
 |
|
Higher resolution screen |
1,040k dots |
vs |
921k dots |
|
More than 10% higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
|
Thinner |
3.1" |
vs |
3.2" |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
 |
|
Lighter |
575 g |
vs |
622 g |
|
Around 10% lighter |
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the Sony SLT A65 |
 |
|
Better color depth |
23.4 bits |
vs |
21.7 bits |
|
Distinguishes 1.7 more bits of color |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly better image quality |
74.0 |
vs |
62.0 |
|
Around 20% better image quality |
|
|
 |
|
More dynamic range |
12.6 EV |
vs |
11.2 EV |
|
1.4 f-stops more dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Much larger viewfinder |
0.71x |
vs |
0.53x |
|
More than 80% larger viewfinder |
|
|
 |
|
Image stabilization |
Sensor shift |
vs |
None |
|
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements |
|
|
 |
|
Shoots much faster |
10 fps |
vs |
5 fps |
|
2x faster continuous shooting |
|
|
 |
|
Has a GPS |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling |
|
|
 |
|
Takes 3D photos |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly larger sensor |
APS-C 23.5x15.6mm |
vs |
APS-C 22.3x14.9mm |
|
More than 10% larger sensor |
|
|
 |
|
Can create panoramas in-camera |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly higher true resolution |
24 MP |
vs |
17.9 MP |
|
Capture more than 30% more detail in your photos |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly less shutter lag |
138 ms |
vs |
269 ms |
|
Around 50% less delay when taking photos |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly better viewfinder coverage |
100% |
vs |
95% |
|
Around 10% better viewfinder coverage |
|
|
 |
|
Better maximum light sensitivity |
16,000 ISO |
vs |
12,800 ISO |
|
The SLT A65's maximum light sensitivity is 0.3 f-stops better |
|
|
 |
|
Longer battery life |
560 shots |
vs |
440 shots |
|
Around 30% more shots per battery charge |
|
|
 |
|
More focus points |
15 |
vs |
9 |
|
Set focus accurately within the frame |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly smaller |
132x97x81 mm |
vs |
133x99x78 mm |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
|
|
|
Showing 1 comments