Updated (May 2012): Compare the Canon EOS 650D vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 vs Canon EOS 650D

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

55

Canon EOS 650D

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
11 fps
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 650D

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 650D.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$472 - $498

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$600 - $698

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$248

3D Takes 3D photos
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Size Larger

Canon EOS 650D Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$470 - $649 body only

$549 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Lowest price Cheaper
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$669 body only

$599 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Autofocus Lacks video autofocus
Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$715 - $749 body only

$749 with 18-55mm lens

Overall image quality Better image quality
Dynamic range More dynamic range

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100
Lumix DMC-FZ100
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon EOS 650D
EOS 650D
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments