Updated (May 2012): Compare the Canon EOS 650D vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 vs Canon EOS 650D

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

48

Canon EOS 650D

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
11 fps
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 650D

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 650D.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$322

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15

Pro digicam

$422

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Size Significantly smaller
Wide angle Worse wide angle

Canon EOS 650D Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$649 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$400 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen No touch screen
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$500 body only

$539 - $630 with 18-55mm lens

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100
Lumix DMC-FZ100
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon EOS 650D
EOS 650D
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments