Advantages of the Canon 650D |
 |
|
Higher resolution movies |
1080p @ 30fps |
vs |
720p @ 24fps |
|
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video at a higher frame rate |
|
|
 |
|
Has an external mic jack |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Record high quality audio with an external microphone |
|
|
 |
|
Video autofocus |
Phase detection |
vs |
None |
|
Automatically focuses shooting video |
|
|
 |
|
Has a touch screen |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus |
|
|
 |
|
Has in-camera HDR |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Better maximum light sensitivity |
12,800 ISO |
vs |
3,200 ISO |
|
The 650D's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better |
|
|
 |
|
Has a flip-out screen |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Flip-out screens can be helpful when composing tricky shots or taking movies |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly more cross-type focus points |
9 |
vs |
1 |
|
Grab focus in difficult situations |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly higher true resolution |
17.9 MP |
vs |
12.2 MP |
|
Capture around 50% more detail in your photos |
|
|
|
|
Better boost ISO |
25,600 ISO |
vs |
6,400 ISO |
|
The 650D's boost ISO is 2 f-stops better |
|
|
 |
|
Higher resolution screen |
1,040k dots |
vs |
930k dots |
|
More than 10% higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
|
Lighter |
575 g |
vs |
703 g |
|
Around 20% lighter |
|
|
 |
|
Shoots slightly faster |
5 fps |
vs |
4.5 fps |
|
More than 10% faster continuous shooting |
|
|
 |
|
Cheaper |
$579.66 |
vs |
$674.95 |
|
The best price we've seen is $95 cheaper (more than 10% less) |
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the Nikon D90 |
 |
|
Lower noise at high ISO |
977 ISO |
vs |
722 ISO |
|
The D90 has a slight edge (0.4 f-stops) in low noise, high ISO performance |
|
|
 |
|
More dynamic range |
12.5 EV |
vs |
11.2 EV |
|
1.3 f-stops more dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly better image quality |
73.0 |
vs |
62.0 |
|
Around 20% better image quality |
|
|
 |
|
Much larger sensor |
APS-C 23.6x15.8mm |
vs |
APS-C 22.3x14.9mm |
|
More than 10% larger sensor |
|
|
 |
|
Better color depth |
22.7 bits |
vs |
21.7 bits |
|
Distinguishes 1 more bits of color |
|
|
 |
|
Much longer battery life |
850 shots |
vs |
440 shots |
|
More than 90% more shots per battery charge |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly larger viewfinder |
0.63x |
vs |
0.53x |
|
More than 40% larger viewfinder |
|
|
 |
|
Less shutter lag |
208 ms |
vs |
269 ms |
|
More than 20% less delay when taking photos |
|
|
|
|
Has a pentaprism viewfinder |
Pentaprism |
vs |
Pentamirror |
|
Pentaprism viewfinders are typically brighter |
|
|
 |
|
Less startup delay |
300 ms |
vs |
700 ms |
|
2.3x less delay when turning on |
|
|
|
|
Better viewfinder coverage |
96% |
vs |
95% |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly more lenses available |
169 lenses |
vs |
162 lenses |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly more focus points |
11 |
vs |
9 |
|
Set focus accurately within the frame |
|
|
 |
|
Thinner |
3" |
vs |
3.1" |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
|
|
|
Showing 0 comments