Advantages of the Canon 650D |
 |
|
Higher resolution movies |
1080p @ 30fps |
vs |
720p @ 30fps |
|
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video |
|
|
 |
|
Much higher resolution screen |
1,040k dots |
vs |
230k dots |
|
More than 4.5x higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
|
Much larger screen |
3.0" |
vs |
2.7" |
|
More than 10% larger screen |
|
|
 |
|
Video autofocus |
Phase detection |
vs |
None |
|
Automatically focuses shooting video |
|
|
 |
|
Has a touch screen |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus |
|
|
 |
|
Has an external mic jack |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Record high quality audio with an external microphone |
|
|
 |
|
Has in-camera HDR |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Supports 24p |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Get that real film feel |
|
|
 |
|
Has a flip-out screen |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Flip-out screens can be helpful when composing tricky shots or taking movies |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly higher true resolution |
17.9 MP |
vs |
12.2 MP |
|
Capture around 50% more detail in your photos |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly more cross-type focus points |
9 |
vs |
1 |
|
Grab focus in difficult situations |
|
|
 |
|
Shoots faster |
5 fps |
vs |
3 fps |
|
Around 70% faster continuous shooting |
|
|
 |
|
Has a self cleaning sensor |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Removes dust from the sensor automatically, avoiding spots in photos |
|
|
 |
|
More dynamic range |
11.2 EV |
vs |
11 EV |
|
0.2 f-stops more dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Better maximum light sensitivity |
12,800 ISO |
vs |
6,400 ISO |
|
The 650D's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better |
|
|
 |
|
Less shutter lag |
269 ms |
vs |
309 ms |
|
More than 10% less delay when taking photos |
|
|
 |
|
Larger sensor |
APS-C 22.3x14.9mm |
vs |
APS-C 22.2x14.7mm |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the Canon T3 |
 |
|
Better color depth |
21.9 bits |
vs |
21.7 bits |
|
Distinguishes 0.2 more bits of color |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly longer battery life |
700 shots |
vs |
440 shots |
|
Around 60% more shots per battery charge |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly lower noise at high ISO |
755 ISO |
vs |
722 ISO |
|
The T3 has a slight edge (0.1 f-stops) in low noise, high ISO performance |
|
|
 |
|
Less startup delay |
300 ms |
vs |
700 ms |
|
2.3x less delay when turning on |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly cheaper |
$327.69 |
vs |
$628.23 |
|
The best price we've seen is $301 cheaper (around 50% less) |
|
|
 |
|
Lighter |
459 g |
vs |
575 g |
|
More than 20% lighter |
|
|
 |
|
Smaller |
130x100x78 mm |
vs |
133x99x78 mm |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly larger viewfinder |
0.54x |
vs |
0.53x |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
|
|
Slightly thinner |
3.1" |
vs |
3.1" |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
|
|
|
Showing 0 comments