Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs Sony a6400

Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Placeholder

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.71x
Many lenses available
Lens availability
165 lenses
Great battery life
Battery life
950 shots
 

Reasons to buy the Sony a6400

Light sensitivity
High ISO
102,800 ISO
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 5D Mark III.

competitors

Canon EOS 5D Mark III Competitors

Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,149 - $1,297 body only

$1,797 with 24-120mm lens

Built-in focus motor Has a built-in focus motor
Battery life Much longer battery life
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$999 - $1,499 body only

$1,330 - $1,899 with 24-105mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Size Smaller
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$2,219 - $2,999 body only

$2,558 - $3,899 with 24-105mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Storage slots Has fewer storage slots

Sony a6400 Competitors

Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T30

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$899 body only

$999 - $1,039 with 15-45mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Viewfinder size Larger viewfinder
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Placeholder

Canon EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Screen resolution Slightly higher resolution screen
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,098 body only

$1,498 with 18-135mm lens

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity

discussion

Canon EOS 5D Mark III
EOS 5D Mark III
Canon

Report a correction
Placeholder
a6400
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments