Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs Sony SLT A65

Winner
Placeholder

100

Placeholder

74

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,293 ISO
Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
500 ms startup delay
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Pentaprism
 

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A65

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
10 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 5D Mark III.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT-A65.

competitors

Canon EOS 5D Mark III Competitors

Placeholder

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$3,299 body only

$4,049 with 24-70mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Storage slots Has fewer storage slots
Placeholder

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$1,399 body only

$1,799 with 24-105mm lens

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO
Cross type focus points Many fewer cross-type focus points
Placeholder

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,797 body only

$2,297 with 24-120mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Better image quality
Cross type focus points Many fewer cross-type focus points

Sony SLT-A65 Competitors

Placeholder

Sony SLT-A68

Boutique

Focus points Significantly more focus points
Screen size Much smaller screen
Placeholder

Sony SLT A58

Entry-level DSLR

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO
Screen size Much smaller screen
Placeholder

Sony SLT A57

Entry-level DSLR

Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
True resolution Significantly lower true resolution

discussion

Placeholder
EOS 5D Mark III
Canon

Report a correction
Placeholder
SLT A65
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments