Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,293 ISO
Great color depth
Color depth
24 bits
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
120 ms shutter lag
More storage slots
Storage slots
2
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,620k dots
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Pentaprism

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 5D Mark III.

competitors

Canon EOS 5D Mark III Competitors

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$1,049 - $1,299 body only

$1,599 - $1,699 with 24-105mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Size Smaller
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,379 - $1,797 body only

$1,956 - $2,297 with 24-120mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Slightly smaller viewfinder
Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Pro DSLR

$1,065 - $1,499 body only

$1,469 - $1,949 with 18-135mm lens

Lens availability More lenses available
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Competitors

Canon EOS 5DS

Canon EOS 5DS

Pro DSLR

$2,332 - $3,499 body only

$3,699 with 24-105mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Pro DSLR

$5,135 - $5,499 body only

$6,498 with 16-35mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Viewfinder size Larger viewfinder
True resolution Significantly lower true resolution
Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,379 - $1,797 body only

$1,956 - $2,297 with 24-120mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Storage slots Has more storage slots
Touch screen No touch screen

discussion

Canon EOS 5D Mark III
EOS 5D Mark III
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
EOS 5D Mark IV
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments