Canon PowerShot G16 vs Canon EOS 100D

Winner
Canon PowerShot G16

71

Canon EOS 100D

56

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G16

Really small
Size
Mid size (109×76×40 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Thin
Thickness
1.6"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 100D

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
600 ms startup delay
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 100D.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G16.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G16 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$415

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$679

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15

Pro digicam

$375

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Lowest price Cheaper
Overall image quality Worse image quality

Canon EOS 100D Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$325 - $749 body only

$375 - $449 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon EOS 700D

Canon EOS 700D

Entry-level DSLR

$288 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Larger
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$426 body only

$392 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Dynamic range More dynamic range
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR

discussion

Canon PowerShot G16
PowerShot G16
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS 100D
EOS 100D
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments