Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung ES75

Winner
Canon ELPH 520 HS

56
Samsung ES75

37

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung ES75

We are not aware of any reasons to consider buying the Samsung ES75 over the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS.
More detailed differences and similarities →

galleries

Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 520 HS.
Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Samsung ES75.

competitors

Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

Placeholder

Canon PowerShot SD200

Ultra compact

$453

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Compare the PowerShot SD200 vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Nikon Coolpix S9300

Nikon Coolpix S9300

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
Compare the Coolpix S9300 vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Compact

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Compare the ELPH 100 HS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Samsung ES75 Competitors

Olympus SZ-10

Olympus SZ10

Travel zoom

$190

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Screen size Larger screen
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Compare the SZ10 vs the ES75
Fujifilm FinePix S4500

Fujifilm FinePix S4500

Super zoom

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen size Larger screen
Compare the FinePix S4500 vs the ES75
Fujifilm Finepix JX500

Fujifilm Finepix JX500

Compact

$187

Wide angle Better wide angle
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Compare the Finepix JX500 vs the ES75
More detailed differences and similarities →

discussion

Canon ELPH 520 HS
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung ES75
ES75
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments

More detailed differences and similarities →