Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS vs Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

Winner
Canon ELPH 520 HS

51

Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Ultra compact (87×54×19 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.8
Weight
Light-weight
120 g
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel
Size
Really small
Super compact (86×55×22 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 520 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS.

competitors

Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

Canon ELPH 530 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Ultra compact

$214

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Thickness Slightly thicker
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Travel zoom

$169

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$198 - $229

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$119

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Compact

$150

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Viewfinder No viewfinder
Canon PowerShot A2500

Canon PowerShot A2500

Compact

$109

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Viewfinder No viewfinder

discussion

Canon ELPH 520 HS
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS
PowerShot SD1200 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments