Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS vs Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

Winner
Canon ELPH 520 HS

54

Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 24fps
Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Ultra compact (87×54×19 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

Weight
Light-weight
120 g
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel
Size
Really small
Super compact (86×55×22 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 520 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS.

competitors

Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$318 - $649 body only

$367 - $449 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Size Much larger
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$149

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Travel zoom

$268

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Travel zoom

$123

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Ultra compact

$339

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Wide angle Better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Travel zoom

$228

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Much larger

discussion

Canon ELPH 520 HS
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS
PowerShot SD1200 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments