Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS vs Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

Winner
Canon ELPH 520 HS

51

Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

43

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Ultra compact (87×54×19 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.8
Weight
Light-weight
120 g
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel
Size
Really small
Super compact (86×55×22 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 520 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS.

competitors

Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

Canon ELPH 530 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Ultra compact

$214

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Thickness Slightly thicker
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$119

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$177 - $199

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
GPS Has a GPS
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$138 - $148

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Compact

$194

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Viewfinder No viewfinder
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$119

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

discussion

Canon ELPH 520 HS
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS
PowerShot SD1200 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments