Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Canon ELPH 500 HS
Nikon Coolpix S9100

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 500 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Really small
Size
Compact (101×55×25 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
9.5 fps
Size
Really small
Compact (105×62×35 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 500 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Canon ELPH 500 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$199 - $200

Zoom More zoom
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Autofocus Faster autofocus
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Travel zoom

Zoom More zoom
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Travel zoom

$200

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S800c

Nikon Coolpix S800c

Travel zoom

$290

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen type Has an OLED screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9400

Nikon Coolpix S9400

Travel zoom

$250

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon ELPH 500 HS
ELPH 500 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments