Updated (January, 2012): Compare the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30

vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot WX9

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Size
Really small
Super compact 94x56x19 mm
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 500 HS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.0
Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Less buttons
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon 500 HS

Report a correction
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Aperture Wider aperture f/2.0 vs f/2.6
Help
At its widest zoom, the 500 HS's lens captures slightly more light (0.8 f-stops)
Touch screen Has a touch screen Yes vs No
Help
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies 240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Screen size Larger screen 3.2" vs 3.0"
Help
Around 10% larger screen
Macro focus Better macro capability 3 cm vs 5 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 40% closer to the lens
Wide angle Slightly better wide angle 24 mm vs 25 mm
Help
Almost the same
Longest exposure Longer exposures 15s vs 2s
Help
7.5x longer exposures
Canon ELPH 500 HS Learn more about
the Canon 500 HS

Advantages of the Sony WX9

Report a correction
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen 921k dots vs 461k dots
Help
Around 2x higher resolution screen
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
HDR Has in-camera HDR Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Size Smaller 94x56x19 mm vs 100x55x25 mm
Help
More than 20% smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 10 fps vs 3.4 fps
Help
Around 3x faster continuous shooting
Weight Lighter 139 g vs 185 g
Help
More than 20% lighter
Thickness Thinner 0.8" vs 1"
Help
More than 20% thinner
Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9 Learn more about
the Sony WX9
vs

recommendations

Snapsort can't make a recommendation (yet) because it doesn't have enough data yet about the Canon 500 HS.

similarities

Compared to recent compacts

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Aperture Wide aperture Help
500 HS:f/2.0
WX9:f/2.6
Sensor type Better sensor types Help
Better in low light
Supports RAW No RAW support Help
Less editing fidelity
Zoom Poor zoom Help
500 HS:4.4x
WX9:5x

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Ultra compact

$138

Light sensitivity Much higher maximum light sensitivity
Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
Screen size Has a slightly smaller screen
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$220

Screen size Has a slightly smaller screen
Screen resolution Has a slightly lower resolution screen
Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$140 - $199

Zoom Has much more zoom
Thickness Is thicker
Weight Is significantly heavier
Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$230 - $249

True resolution Takes slightly higher resolution photos
Light sensitivity Much higher maximum light sensitivity
Thickness Is thicker
Weight Is slightly heavier

Canon ELPH 500 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Travel zoom

$179 - $204

Zoom More zoom
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Travel zoom

Macro focus Better macro capability
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Compact

$155 - $250

Size Smaller
Weight Lighter
Aperture Narrower aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly slower
Canon ELPH 510 HS

Canon ELPH 510 HS

Travel zoom

$165

Zoom More zoom
Macro focus Better macro capability
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support
Olympus VR-370

Olympus VR-370

Travel zoom

$79

Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Pentax MX-1

Pentax MX-1

Pro digicam

$290

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Much larger
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Travel zoom

$148

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Olympus VH-510

Olympus VH-510

Travel zoom

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Longest exposure Slightly longer exposures
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F

Ultra compact

$85 - $150

Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Size Slightly smaller
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$498

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Size Much larger
3D Doesn't take 3D photos

appearance

Canon ELPH 500 HS Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
Canon ELPH 500 HS Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
Canon ELPH 500 HS Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9

discussion

Canon ELPH 500 HS
ELPH 500 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
Cybershot WX9
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (4:24 PM, December 09, 2011)
Hi Snow, which part did we mix up?  Did you see on the Canon ELPH 500 HS page it says its also known as the Canon IXUS 310 HS?  Maybe we got something wrong here, it is damn confusing the way Canon gives their cameras different names in different places :)
 
Snowjoe (4:06 PM, December 09, 2011)
This site is rubish. They mixed up camera models and data (Ixus and Elph). Don't trust thi site!