Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 500 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Really small
Size
Compact (101×55×25 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
Size
Really small
Compact (106×59×33 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 500 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS.

competitors

Canon ELPH 500 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200

Pro digicam

$330

Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1

Pro digicam

$206

Screen type Has an OLED screen
External flash Supports an external flash
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$179 - $184

Zoom More zoom
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Travel zoom

$239

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $599 with 15-45mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Touch screen Has a touch screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$178 - $199

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon ELPH 500 HS
ELPH 500 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
PowerShot SX230 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments