Updated (January, 2012): Compare the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 500 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.0
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Really small
Size
Compact 100x55x25 mm
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

differences

Advantages of the Canon 500 HS

Report a correction
Aperture
Significantly wider aperture
f/2.0 vs f/3.1
Help
At its widest zoom, the 500 HS's lens captures much more light (1.3 f-stops)
Wide angle
Much better wide angle
24 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Touch screen
Has a touch screen
Yes vs No
Help
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus
Size
Significantly smaller
100x55x25 mm vs 106x59x33 mm
Help
More than 30% smaller
Screen size
Larger screen
3.2" vs 3.0"
Help
Around 10% larger screen
Macro focus
Better macro capability
3 cm vs 5 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 40% closer to the lens
Thickness
Significantly thinner
1" vs 1.3"
Help
More than 20% thinner
Weight
Lighter
185 g vs 215 g
Help
More than 10% lighter
Lowest price
Cheaper
$145.00 vs $214.99
Help
The best price we've seen is $70 cheaper (more than 30% less)
Canon ELPH 500 HS Learn more about
the Canon 500 HS

Advantages of the Canon SX230 HS

Report a correction
Zoom
More zoom
14x vs 4.4x
Help
More than 10x more zoom
Panorama
Can create panoramas in-camera
Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
GPS
Has a GPS
Yes vs No
Help
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling
Fastest shutter speed
Much faster max shutter speed
1/3200s vs 1/1000s
Help
3.2x faster max shutter speed
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Learn more about
the Canon SX230 HS
vs

recommendations

Snapsort can't make a recommendation (yet) because it doesn't have enough data yet about the 500 HS.

similarities

Compared to recent compacts

Common Strengths
Supports 24p Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Help
For that film look
High-speed framerate Extremely high speed movies Help
240 fps
Movie format Full HD (1080p) video Help
500 HS1080p @ 24fps
SX230 HS1080p @ 30fps
Sensor type Better sensor types Help
Better in low light
Common Weaknesses
Waterproof Not waterproof Help
Stay on land
HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
You could do HDR manually
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
500 HS3.4 fps
SX230 HS3.2 fps

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon ELPH 520 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Ultra compact

$148

Size Is slightly smaller
Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
Wide angle Has a much narrower wide angle lens
Aperture Has a much narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Compact

$203

Size Is slightly smaller
Thickness Is thinner
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Has a significantly higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Thickness Is thicker
Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Travel zoom

$279 - $403

Zoom Has way more more zoom
Movie format Records higher quality movies
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Thickness Is thicker
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$220

Size Is slightly smaller
Thickness Is thinner
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$399

Screen resolution Has a significantly higher resolution screen
True resolution Takes slightly higher resolution photos
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
Shutter lag Has slightly less shutter lag
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Thickness Is thicker

Canon ELPH 500 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon ELPH 510 HS

Canon ELPH 510 HS

Travel zoom

$125

Zoom More zoom
Macro focus Better macro capability
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Travel zoom

$149

Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon ELPH 530 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Ultra compact

$173

Size Smaller
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Compact

$169

Size Smaller
Weight Lighter
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Travel zoom

$368

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture
Size Slightly larger
Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Travel zoom

$407

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Supports 24p No 24p support
Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100

Travel zoom

$258

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Travel zoom

$299

Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
GPS No built-in GPS

appearance

Canon ELPH 500 HS Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
Canon ELPH 500 HS Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
Canon ELPH 500 HS Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

discussion

Canon ELPH 500 HS
ELPH 500 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
PowerShot SX230 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments