Updated (January, 2012): Compare the Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Canon ELPH 520 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS vs Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
Canon ELPH 500 HS

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Really small
Size
Ultra compact 87x54x19 mm
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
Light-weight
Weight
155 g
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 500 HS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.0
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Less buttons

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 500 HS. Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 520 HS.

differences

Advantages of the Canon 500 HS

Report a correction
Aperture
Much wider aperture
f/2.0 vs f/3.4
Help
At its widest zoom, the 500 HS's lens captures much more light (1.5 f-stops)
Wide angle
Much better wide angle
24 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Touch screen
Has a touch screen
Yes vs No
Help
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus
Screen size
Larger screen
3.2" vs 3.0"
Help
Around 10% larger screen
Continuous shooting
Shoots slightly faster
3.4 fps vs 2.8 fps
Help
More than 20% faster continuous shooting
Canon ELPH 500 HS Learn more about
the Canon 500 HS

Advantages of the Canon ELPH 520 HS

Report a correction
Size
Smaller
87x54x19 mm vs 100x55x25 mm
Help
Around 40% smaller
Zoom
More zoom
12x vs 4.4x
Help
More than 7.5x more zoom
Macro focus
Better macro capability
1 cm vs 3 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 3x closer to the lens
Fastest shutter speed
Much faster max shutter speed
1/4000s vs 1/1000s
Help
4x faster max shutter speed
Thickness
Thinner
0.7" vs 1"
Help
More than 20% thinner
Weight
Lighter
155 g vs 185 g
Help
Around 20% lighter
Canon ELPH 520 HS Learn more about
the Canon ELPH 520 HS
vs

recommendations

Snapsort can't make a recommendation (yet) because it doesn't have enough data yet about the 500 HS.

similarities

Compared to recent compacts

Common Strengths
High-speed framerate Extremely high speed movies Help
240 fps
Supports 24p Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Help
For that film look
Movie format Both shoot high resolution HD movies Help
1080p @ 24fps
Size Fairly small Help
500 HS100x55x25 mm
ELPH 520 HS87x54x19 mm
Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
Lens
Sensor type Better sensor types Help
Better in low light
Common Weaknesses
Waterproof Not waterproof Help
Stay on land
Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
You could stitch photos in post
HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
You could do HDR manually
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
500 HS3.4 fps
ELPH 520 HS2.8 fps
Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
Less flexible
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
3,200 ISO

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Travel zoom

$570

Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Lowest price Is much more expensive
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Travel zoom

$274

Zoom Has significantly more zoom
Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Thickness Is thicker
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Travel zoom

$149

Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Supports 24p Doesn't record movies in 24p
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$175

Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Compact

$220

Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Compact

$214

Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Canon ELPH 530 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Ultra compact

$181

Wide angle Has a much narrower wide angle lens
Aperture Has a much narrower aperture

Canon ELPH 500 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Ultra compact

$220

Size Smaller
Shutter lag Less shutter lag
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Travel zoom

$217 - $248

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Much narrower aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350

Ultra compact

$168

Size Significantly smaller
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Movie format Lower resolution movies
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon ELPH 115 HS

Canon ELPH 115 HS

Travel zoom

$80

Aperture Wider aperture
Weight Lighter
Movie format Lower resolution movies
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

appearance

Canon ELPH 500 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS
Canon ELPH 500 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS
Canon ELPH 500 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS

discussion

Canon ELPH 500 HS
ELPH 500 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 520 HS
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments