Updated (January, 2012): Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Canon ELPH 520 HS

vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Size
Really small
Ultra compact 87x54x19 mm
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 300 HS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.7
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Size
Really small
Super compact 92x55x19 mm
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon 300 HS

Report a correction
Aperture Significantly wider aperture f/2.7 vs f/3.4
Help
At its widest zoom, the 300 HS's lens captures slightly more light (0.7 f-stops)
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle 24 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Weight Lighter 141 g vs 155 g
Help
Around 10% lighter
Canon ELPH 300 HS Learn more about
the Canon 300 HS

Advantages of the Canon ELPH 520 HS

Report a correction
Screen size Significantly larger screen 3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Zoom More zoom 12x vs 5x
Help
Around 6x more zoom
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 461k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Macro focus Better macro capability 1 cm vs 3 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 3x closer to the lens
Size Slightly smaller 87x54x19 mm vs 92x55x19 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Lowest price Cheaper $109.00 vs $175.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $66 cheaper (around 40% less)
Canon ELPH 520 HS Learn more about
the Canon ELPH 520 HS
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Canon ELPH 300 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS 54
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        56 Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Supports 24p Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Help
              For that film look
              Size Fairly small Help
              300 HS:92x55x19 mm
              ELPH 520 HS:87x54x19 mm
              High-speed framerate Very high speed movies Help
              240 fps
              Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
              Lens
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Thickness Thin Help
              300 HS:0.8"
              ELPH 520 HS:0.7"
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              300 HS:3.4 fps
              ELPH 520 HS:2.8 fps
              3D Neither camera can take 3D photos Help
              No 3d support

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon ELPH 330 HS

              Canon ELPH 330 HS

              Travel zoom

              $160

              Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
              Thickness Is thicker
              Size Is slightly larger
              Canon ELPH 530 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

              Ultra compact

              $120

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
              Aperture Has a significantly narrower aperture
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Compact

              $186

              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

              Canon ELPH 320 HS

              Compact

              $147 - $250

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

              Travel zoom

              $200 - $300

              Zoom Has significantly more zoom
              Panorama Creates panoramas in-camera
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker
              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Travel zoom

              $179

              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Size Is slightly larger
              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

              Travel zoom

              $109

              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              Supports 24p Doesn't record movies in 24p

              Canon ELPH 300 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              No significant competitors found that are specific to the Canon ELPH 300 HS.

              Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Travel zoom

              $148 - $191

              Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
              3D Takes 3D photos
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Screen size Significantly smaller screen

              appearance

              Canon ELPH 300 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS
              Canon ELPH 300 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS
              Canon ELPH 300 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS

              discussion

              Canon ELPH 300 HS
              ELPH 300 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Canon ELPH 520 HS
              PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments