Sony Cyber-shot WX50 vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Winner
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

62

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

56

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.6
Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 60fps
Really small
Size
Ultra compact (92×52×19 mm)
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.7
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 24fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Travel zoom

$329

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Zoom More zoom
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS

Compact

$99

Screen size Much larger screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$437 body only

$370 - $379 with 16-50mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Travel zoom

$119

Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Travel zoom

$120 - $150

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$100

Size Slightly smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
Cyber-shot WX50
Sony

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments