Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S8200

Winner
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

51

Nikon Coolpix S8200

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Super compact (93×57×20 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S8200

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
961k dots
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
6 fps
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 37 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S8200.

competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Travel zoom

$85 - $99

Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$159

GPS Has a GPS
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$399

Touch screen Has a touch screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S8200 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Much larger
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$123 - $197

Zoom More zoom
Size Smaller
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Much larger

discussion

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S8200
Coolpix S8200
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments