Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S6300

Winner
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

52

Nikon Coolpix S6300

43

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Super compact (93×57×20 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S6300

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
6 fps
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 16 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S6300.

competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Travel zoom

$99

Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$114 - $119

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$158 - $159

GPS Has a GPS
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S6300 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$123 - $150

Screen size Much larger screen
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$448 body only

$598 with 16-50mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Much larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Ultra compact

$149

Aperture Wider aperture
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Zoom Slightly less zoom

discussion

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S6300
Coolpix S6300
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments