Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS vs Kodak EasyShare M320

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

61

vs

Kodak EasyShare M320

44

Kodak EasyShare M320

Runner-up
     

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Kodak EasyShare M320

We are not aware of any reasons to consider buying the Kodak EasyShare M320 over the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
 

differences

Advantages of the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Report a correction
Wide angle
Much better wide angle
24 mm vs 34 mm
Help
Around 30% better wide angle
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
Lens vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Movie format
Higher resolution movies
1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots high resolution Full HD (1080p) video but at a lower frame rate
Supports 24p
Supports 24p
Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Macro focus
Much better macro capability
3 cm vs 10 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 3.3x closer to the lens
High-speed framerate
Records high-speed movies
240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Sensor type
Has a CMOS-family sensor
CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
Screen size
Larger screen
3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Screen resolution
Higher resolution screen
461k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Size
Smaller
93x57x20 mm vs 97x60x21 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Aperture
Slightly wider aperture
f/2.7 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest zoom, the ELPH 110 HS's lens captures marginally more light (0.1 f-stops)
True resolution
Higher true resolution
9.7 MP vs 8.6 MP
Help
Capture more than 10% more detail in your photos
Light sensitivity
Better maximum light sensitivity
3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
Help
The ELPH 110 HS's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
Weight
Lighter
135 g vs 155 g
Help
More than 10% lighter
Sensor size
Slightly larger sensor
1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
Help
More than 10% larger sensor
Lowest price
Cheaper
$198.95 vs $349.99
Help
The best price we've seen is $151 cheaper (more than 40% less)
Longest exposure
Longer exposures
15s vs 4s
Help
Around 4x longer exposures
Thickness
Slightly thinner
0.8" vs 0.8"
Help
Almost the same
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Learn more about
the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Advantages of the Kodak M320

Report a correction
Snapsort is not aware of any important advantages of the Kodak M320 vs the Canon ELPH 110 HS.
Kodak EasyShare M320 Learn more about
the Kodak M320
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS 61
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        44 Kodak EasyShare M320 Kodak EasyShare M320
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths
              Size Fairly small Help
              ELPH 110 HS:93x57x20 mm
              M320:97x60x21 mm
              Thickness Thin Help
              0.8"
              Common Weaknesses
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              ELPH 110 HS:5x
              M320:3x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

              Canon ELPH 320 HS

              Compact

              $180 - $200

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Compact

              $230

              Canon ELPH 100 HS

              Canon ELPH 100 HS

              Compact

              $125 - $180

              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
              Canon ELPH 530 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

              Ultra compact

              $179 - $289

              Zoom Has slightly more zoom
              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Travel zoom

              $149

              Zoom More zoom
              Continuous shooting Shoots faster
              Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Travel zoom

              $99 - $182

              Zoom More zoom
              Battery life Longer battery life
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Canon PowerShot S110

              Canon PowerShot S110

              Pro digicam

              $179 - $249

              Aperture Wider aperture
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Size Larger
              Weight Heavier
              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Travel zoom

              $586

              Zoom More zoom
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Size Larger
              Canon ELPH 520 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

              Ultra compact

              $150 - $189

              Zoom More zoom
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Wide angle Worse wide angle

              Kodak EasyShare M320 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Kodak EasyShare M893 IS

              Kodak EasyShare M893 IS

              Compact

              $250

              Image stabilization Image stabilization
              Lowest price Cheaper
              Macro focus Much worse macro capability
              Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
              Placeholder

              Kodak mc3

              Digicam

              Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
              Built-in flash No built-in flash
              Screen size Much smaller screen
              Placeholder

              Olympus D-545 Zoom

              Compact

              Macro focus Much better macro capability
              Longest exposure Longer exposures
              Screen size Much smaller screen
              Size Significantly larger
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

              Sony Cyber-shot WX50

              Ultra compact

              $207

              Image stabilization Image stabilization
              Wide angle Much better wide angle
              Canon PowerShot A495

              Canon PowerShot A495

              Compact

              $150

              Macro focus Much better macro capability
              True resolution Higher true resolution
              Size Larger
              Wide angle Worse wide angle

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Kodak EasyShare M320
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Kodak EasyShare M320
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Kodak EasyShare M320

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Kodak EasyShare M320
              EasyShare M320
              Kodak

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments