Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS vs Kodak EasyShare M320

vs

Kodak EasyShare M320

46

Kodak EasyShare M320

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Kodak EasyShare M320

We are not aware of any reasons to consider buying the Kodak EasyShare M320 over the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Report a correction
Wide angle Much better wide angle 24 mm vs 34 mm
Help
Around 30% better wide angle
Image stabilization Image stabilization Lens vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Movie format Higher resolution movies 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots high resolution Full HD (1080p) video but at a lower frame rate
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies 240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
Macro focus Much better macro capability 3 cm vs 10 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 3.3x closer to the lens
Screen size Larger screen 3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 461k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Size Smaller 93x57x20 mm vs 97x60x21 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Aperture Slightly wider aperture f/2.7 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest zoom, the ELPH 110 HS's lens captures marginally more light (0.1 f-stops)
True resolution Higher true resolution 9.7 MP vs 8.6 MP
Help
Capture more than 10% more detail in your photos
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
Help
The ELPH 110 HS's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
Weight Lighter 135 g vs 155 g
Help
More than 10% lighter
Sensor size Slightly larger sensor 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
Help
More than 10% larger sensor
Thickness Slightly thinner 0.8" vs 0.8"
Help
Almost the same
Longest exposure Longer exposures 15s vs 4s
Help
Around 4x longer exposures
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Learn more about
the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Advantages of the Kodak M320

Report a correction
Snapsort is not aware of any important advantages of the Kodak M320 vs the Canon ELPH 110 HS.
Kodak EasyShare M320 Learn more about
the Kodak M320
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS 63
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        46 Kodak EasyShare M320 Kodak EasyShare M320

        similarities

        Compared to recent compacts

        Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
        Size Fairly small Help
        ELPH 110 HS:93x57x20 mm
        M320:97x60x21 mm
        Thickness Thin Help
        0.8"
        Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
        You could stitch photos in post
        Supports RAW No RAW support Help
        Less editing fidelity
        HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
        You could do HDR manually
        Zoom Poor zoom Help
        ELPH 110 HS:5x
        M320:3x

        competitors

        Shared Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Canon ELPH 300 HS

        Canon ELPH 300 HS

        Compact

        $149 - $179

        Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

        Canon ELPH 320 HS

        Compact

        $130 - $250

        Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
        Touch screen Has a touch screen
        Canon ELPH 100 HS

        Canon ELPH 100 HS

        Compact

        $109 - $180

        Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
        Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

        Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

        Travel zoom

        $120

        Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
        Lowest price Is slightly less expensive
        Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
        Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
        Canon ELPH 310 HS

        Canon ELPH 310 HS

        Travel zoom

        $199

        Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
        Battery life Has a slightly longer battery life
        Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
        Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

        Sony Cyber-shot WX50

        Ultra compact

        $199

        Light sensitivity Much higher maximum light sensitivity
        Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
        Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing

        Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

        Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

        Travel zoom

        $179 - $204

        Zoom More zoom
        Continuous shooting Shoots faster
        Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
        Supports 24p No 24p support
        Canon PowerShot S110

        Canon PowerShot S110

        Pro digicam

        $230 - $249

        Aperture Wider aperture
        Touch screen Has a touch screen
        Size Larger
        Weight Heavier
        Canon IXUS 255 HS

        Canon IXUS 255 HS

        Travel zoom

        $412

        Zoom More zoom
        Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
        Aperture Narrower aperture
        Size Larger
        Canon ELPH 520 HS

        Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

        Ultra compact

        $159 - $175

        Zoom More zoom
        Size Smaller
        Aperture Narrower aperture
        Wide angle Worse wide angle
        Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

        Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

        Travel zoom

        $110 - $180

        Macro focus Better macro capability
        Zoom Slightly more zoom
        Supports 24p No 24p support
        Movie format Lower resolution movies

        Kodak EasyShare M320 Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Kodak EasyShare M380

        Kodak EasyShare M380

        Compact

        Screen size Larger screen
        True resolution Higher true resolution
        Wide angle Worse wide angle
        Aperture Narrower aperture
        Kodak EasyShare Mini M200

        Kodak EasyShare Mini M200

        Ultra compact

        $75 - $149

        Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
        Image stabilization Image stabilization
        Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
        Screen size Smaller screen
        Olympus Stylus 1040

        Olympus Stylus 1040

        Ultra compact

        $175

        Size Smaller
        Macro focus Better macro capability
        Aperture Narrower aperture
        Wide angle Worse wide angle

        appearance

        Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Kodak EasyShare M320
        Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Kodak EasyShare M320
        Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Kodak EasyShare M320

        discussion

        Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
        PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
        Canon

        Report a correction
        Kodak EasyShare M320
        EasyShare M320
        Kodak

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments