Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS vs Kodak EasyShare M320

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

69

 
Kodak EasyShare M320

44

 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.7
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Kodak EasyShare M320

We are not aware of any reasons to consider buying the Kodak EasyShare M320 over the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
 

differences

Advantages of the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Wide angle Much better wide angle 24 mm vs 34 mm
Help
Around 30% better wide angle
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Image stabilization Image stabilization Lens vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Movie format Higher resolution movies 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots high resolution Full HD (1080p) video but at a lower frame rate
Screen size Significantly larger screen 3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Macro focus Much better macro capability 3 cm vs 10 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 3.3x closer to the lens
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies 240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 461k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
True resolution Higher true resolution 9.7 MP vs 8.6 MP
Help
Capture more than 10% more detail in your photos
Size Smaller 93x57x20 mm vs 97x60x21 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Aperture Slightly wider aperture f/2.7 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest zoom, the ELPH 110 HS's lens captures marginally more light (0.1 f-stops)
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
Help
The ELPH 110 HS's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
Sensor size Larger sensor 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
Help
More than 10% larger sensor
Zoom Slightly more zoom 5x vs 3x
Help
Around 3x more zoom
Weight Lighter 135 g vs 155 g
Help
More than 10% lighter
Fastest shutter speed Faster max shutter speed 1/2000s vs 1/1400s
Help
30% faster max shutter speed
Thickness Slightly thinner 0.8" vs 0.8"
Help
Almost the same
Longest exposure Longer exposures 15s vs 4s
Help
Around 4x longer exposures
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Learn more about
the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Advantages of the Kodak M320

Snapsort is not aware of any important advantages of the Kodak M320 vs the Canon ELPH 110 HS.
Kodak EasyShare M320 Learn more about
the Kodak M320
vs

recommendations

Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
69 vs 44
Explain scores
Kodak EasyShare M320 Kodak EasyShare M320
Green arrow Snapsort recommends the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.

similarities

Compared to recent compacts

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Aperture Wide aperture Help
ELPH 110 HS:f/2.7
M320:f/2.8
Size Fairly small Help
ELPH 110 HS:93x57x20 mm
M320:97x60x21 mm
Thickness Thin Help
0.8"
Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
You could stitch photos in post
HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
You could do HDR manually
3D Neither camera can take 3D photos Help
No 3d support
Touch screen No touchscreens Help
More buttons
Zoom Poor zoom Help
ELPH 110 HS:5x
M320:3x

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

No significant shared competitors found.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Compact

$133 - $149

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen size Larger screen
Size Slightly larger
Weight Slightly heavier
Canon ELPH 520 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Ultra compact

$129 - $155

Zoom More zoom
Size Smaller
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$152

Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Size Slightly smaller
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Travel zoom

$176 - $189

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Macro focus Better macro capability
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Supports 24p No 24p support
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Ultra compact

$100 - $190

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
3D Takes 3D photos
Supports 24p No 24p support
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

Kodak EasyShare M320 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Kodak EasyShare M380

Kodak EasyShare M380

Compact

Screen size Significantly larger screen
True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
Nikon Coolpix L26

Nikon Coolpix L26

Compact

$94

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Size Larger
Nikon D90

Nikon D90

Entry-level DSLR

$675 - $899 body only

$799 - $1,099 with 18-105mm lens

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Much larger
Weight Much heavier
Kodak EasyShare CX6230

Kodak EasyShare CX6230

Digicam

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Fastest shutter speed Faster max shutter speed
Macro focus Much worse macro capability
Screen size Much smaller screen
Kodak EasyShare M1073 IS

Kodak EasyShare M1073 IS

Compact

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Better wide angle
Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity

appearance

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Kodak EasyShare M320
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Kodak EasyShare M320
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Kodak EasyShare M320

discussion

Showing 0 comments