Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Winner
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

53

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

36

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Super compact (93×57×20 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Waterproof
Waterproof
Great at the beach
Size
Really small
Compact (99×68×26 mm)
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Thickness
Thin
1"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix XP50.

competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$318

Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Size Slightly smaller
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$209

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$188 - $199

GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Fujifilm FinePix XP50 Competitors

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80

Waterproof

$145

Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger
Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90

Waterproof

$177 - $200

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Waterproof

$195

Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life

discussion

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix XP50
FinePix XP50
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments