Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100 vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

56

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

52

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
9.6 fps
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Shoots RAW
Supports RAW
Better editing
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact (93×57×20 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
Weight
Light-weight
135 g
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$499

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$449 - $564

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200

Pro digicam

$199

Overall image quality Better image quality
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$270

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Size Slightly smaller
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$199

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$155 - $159

GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments