Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100 vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

57

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

53

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
9.6 fps
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact (93×57×20 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
Weight
Light-weight
135 g
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$360

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$620

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$429 - $449

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Overall image quality Better image quality
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$119 - $130

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$318

Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Size Slightly smaller
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Travel zoom

$119

Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments