Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Tie
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

51

Canon ELPH 520 HS

51

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Large screen
Screen size
3"
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Size
Really small
Ultra compact (87×54×19 mm)
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Screen size
Large screen
3"
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 520 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$300

Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Size Slightly smaller
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$209

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Travel zoom

$119

Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

Canon ELPH 530 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Ultra compact

$220

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Thickness Slightly thicker
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$119 - $130

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$279

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom Significantly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 520 HS
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments