Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon ELPH 500 HS

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Really small
Size
Super compact (93×57×20 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
Light-weight
Weight
135 g
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 500 HS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2
Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 24fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 500 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$130

Size Slightly smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Travel zoom

$109

Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Travel zoom

$120 - $159

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon ELPH 500 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200

Pro digicam

$330

Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1

Pro digicam

$206

Screen type Has an OLED screen
External flash Supports an external flash
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$179 - $184

Zoom More zoom
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 500 HS
ELPH 500 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments