Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS vs Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 300 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Report a correction
Screen size Significantly larger screen 3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 461k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Weight Slightly lighter 135 g vs 141 g
Help
Almost the same
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Learn more about
the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Advantages of the Canon 300 HS

Report a correction
Size Slightly smaller 92x55x19 mm vs 93x57x20 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster 3.4 fps vs 2 fps
Help
70% faster continuous shooting
Canon ELPH 300 HS Learn more about
the Canon 300 HS
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS 56
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        54 Canon ELPH 300 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Supports 24p Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Help
              For that film look
              Aperture Wide aperture Help
              f/2.7
              Size Fairly small Help
              ELPH 110 HS:93x57x20 mm
              300 HS:92x55x19 mm
              High-speed framerate Very high speed movies Help
              240 fps
              Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
              Lens
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Thickness Thin Help
              0.8"
              Weight Light weight Help
              ELPH 110 HS:135 g
              300 HS:141 g
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              ELPH 110 HS:2 fps
              300 HS:3.4 fps
              3D Neither camera can take 3D photos Help
              No 3d support
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              5x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon ELPH 330 HS

              Canon ELPH 330 HS

              Travel zoom

              $197

              Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
              Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
              Thickness Is thicker
              Size Is slightly larger
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

              Canon ELPH 320 HS

              Compact

              $138 - $250

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Travel zoom

              $179

              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Battery life Has a slightly longer battery life
              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Canon ELPH 520 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

              Ultra compact

              $109 - $117

              Zoom Has slightly more zoom
              Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
              Aperture Has a significantly narrower aperture
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

              Travel zoom

              $109

              Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              Supports 24p Doesn't record movies in 24p
              Canon ELPH 100 HS

              Canon ELPH 100 HS

              Compact

              $180

              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
              Canon PowerShot S110

              Canon PowerShot S110

              Pro digicam

              $235 - $359

              Aperture Has a significantly wider aperture
              True resolution Takes significantly higher resolution photos
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon IXUS 132

              Canon IXUS 132

              Travel zoom

              $99

              Autofocus Faster autofocus
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Aperture Narrower aperture

              Canon ELPH 300 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

              Travel zoom

              $199 - $200

              Zoom Much more zoom
              Screen size Significantly larger screen
              Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
              Size Much larger

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Canon ELPH 300 HS
              ELPH 300 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments