Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon ELPH 300 HS

Tie
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

53

Canon ELPH 300 HS

51

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 300 HS

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 300 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$209

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$199 - $220

GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Travel zoom

$159

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon ELPH 300 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Travel zoom

$159

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Travel zoom

$119

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Travel zoom

$329

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

discussion

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 300 HS
ELPH 300 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments