Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS vs Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon ELPH 300 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

59

Canon ELPH 300 HS

57

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 300 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact 92x55x19 mm
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

differences

Advantages of the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Report a correction
Screen size
Larger screen
3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Screen resolution
Higher resolution screen
461k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Weight
Slightly lighter
135 g vs 141 g
Help
Almost the same
Lowest price
Slightly cheaper
$198.95 vs $228.99
Help
The best price we've seen is $30 cheaper (more than 10% less)
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Learn more about
the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Advantages of the Canon 300 HS

Report a correction
Continuous shooting
Shoots slightly faster
3.4 fps vs 2 fps
Help
70% faster continuous shooting
Size
Slightly smaller
92x55x19 mm vs 93x57x20 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller
Canon ELPH 300 HS Learn more about
the Canon 300 HS
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS 59
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        57 Canon ELPH 300 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths
              Supports 24p Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Help
              For that film look
              High-speed framerate Extremely high speed movies Help
              240 fps
              Size Fairly small Help
              ELPH 110 HS:93x57x20 mm
              300 HS:92x55x19 mm
              Aperture Wide aperture Help
              f/2.7
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Thickness Thin Help
              0.8"
              Weight Light weight Help
              ELPH 110 HS:135 g
              300 HS:141 g
              Common Weaknesses
              Waterproof Not waterproof Help
              Stay on land
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              ELPH 110 HS:2 fps
              300 HS:3.4 fps
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              5x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Travel zoom

              $149

              Zoom Has slightly more zoom
              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Supports 24p Doesn't record movies in 24p
              Size Is slightly larger
              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Travel zoom

              $577

              Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Lowest price Is much more expensive
              Canon PowerShot S120

              Canon PowerShot S120

              Pro digicam

              $399

              Aperture Has a significantly wider aperture
              Screen resolution Has a significantly higher resolution screen
              Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Travel zoom

              $109 - $161

              Battery life Has a slightly longer battery life
              Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
              Thickness Is thicker
              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              Canon PowerShot S110

              Canon PowerShot S110

              Pro digicam

              $179

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              True resolution Takes slightly higher resolution photos
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

              Canon ELPH 320 HS

              Compact

              $159

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Travel zoom

              $258

              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Battery life Has a slightly longer battery life
              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

              Travel zoom

              $125

              Battery life Longer battery life
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

              Canon ELPH 300 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              No significant competitors found that are specific to the Canon ELPH 300 HS.

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Canon ELPH 300 HS
              ELPH 300 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments