Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon ELPH 300 HS

Tie
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

51

Canon ELPH 300 HS

50

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 300 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.7
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.
Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 300 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Travel zoom

$85 - $99

Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$105 - $119

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$159

GPS Has a GPS
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon ELPH 300 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Travel zoom

$149

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$159

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$199

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 300 HS
ELPH 300 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments