Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9

Sony Cybershot WX9 vs Canon ELPH 100 HS

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9

60

Canon ELPH 100 HS

53

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot WX9

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 60fps
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
10 fps
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 100 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact (93×56×20 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 24fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 100 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9 Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Compact

$221

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Canon PowerShot A2500

Canon PowerShot A2500

Compact

$109

Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed
Weight Slightly lighter
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10

Sony Cybershot WX10

Compact

$386

Wide angle Better wide angle
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

Canon ELPH 100 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95

Pro digicam

$280

Aperture Wider aperture
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Compact

$229

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly slower
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Travel zoom

$224

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
Cybershot WX9
Sony

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 100 HS
ELPH 100 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments