Updated (January, 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Sony Cybershot DSC-W650

Sony Cybershot DSC-W650 vs Canon ELPH 100 HS

Tie
Sony Cybershot DSC-W650

55

Canon ELPH 100 HS

54

Tie

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-W650

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.6
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
25 mm
Really small
Size
Super compact (94×56×19 mm)
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 100 HS

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 24fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Screen size
Large screen
3"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 100 HS.
Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-W650.

differences

Advantages of the Canon 100 HS

Report a correction
Movie format
Higher resolution movies
1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video but at a lower frame rate
High-speed framerate
Records high-speed movies
240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Supports 24p
Supports 24p
Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Sensor type
Has a CMOS-family sensor
CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
Macro focus
Better macro capability
3.0 cm vs 5.0 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 40% closer to the lens
Longest exposure
Longer exposures
15s vs 2s
Help
7.5x longer exposures
Canon ELPH 100 HS Learn more about
the Canon 100 HS

Advantages of the Sony DSC-W650

Report a correction
Wide angle
Significantly better wide angle
25 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Panorama
Can create panoramas in-camera
Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Aperture
Wider aperture
f/2.6 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest zoom, the DSC-W650's lens captures marginally more light (0.2 f-stops)
Weight
Lighter
124 g vs 140 g
Help
More than 10% lighter
Thickness
Slightly thinner
0.7" vs 0.8"
Help
Almost the same
Fastest shutter speed
Slightly faster max shutter speed
1/1600s vs 1/1500s
Help
Around 10% faster max shutter speed
Sony Cybershot DSC-W650 Learn more about
the Sony DSC-W650
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Canon ELPH 100 HS Canon ELPH 100 HS 54
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        55 Sony Cybershot DSC-W650 Sony Cybershot DSC-W650
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths
              Size Fairly small Help
              100 HS93×56×20 mm
              DSC-W65094×56×19 mm
              Aperture Wide aperture Help
              100 HSf/2.8
              DSC-W650f/2.6
              Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
              1. Lens
              Thickness Thin Help
              100 HS0.8"
              DSC-W6500.7"
              Weight Light weight Help
              100 HS140 g
              DSC-W650124 g
              Common Weaknesses
              Fastest shutter speed Slow max shutter speed Help
              100 HS1/1500s
              DSC-W6501/1600s
              Waterproof Not waterproof Help
              Stay on land
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
              3,200 ISO
              Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
              230k dots
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              100 HS4x
              DSC-W6505x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Compact

              $250

              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Screen resolution Has a slightly higher resolution screen
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Travel zoom

              $177 - $179

              Screen resolution Has a slightly higher resolution screen
              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Size Is slightly larger
              Aperture Has a significantly narrower aperture

              Canon ELPH 100 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Compact

              $295

              Wide angle Much better wide angle
              Aperture Slightly wider aperture
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Lowest price More expensive
              Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

              Travel zoom

              $320

              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Super zoom

              $239

              Zoom Much more zoom
              Wide angle Much better wide angle
              Size Much larger
              Thickness Much thicker
              Nikon Coolpix 3200

              Nikon Coolpix 3200

              Compact

              $149

              Aperture Wider aperture
              Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
              Wide angle Much worse wide angle
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

              Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

              Ultra compact

              $268

              Size Slightly smaller
              Weight Lighter
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

              Sony Cybershot DSC-W650 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cybershot DSC-W570

              Sony Cybershot W570

              Ultra compact

              $111

              Size Slightly smaller
              Weight Slightly lighter
              Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Sony Cybershot DSC-W580

              Sony Cybershot W580

              Compact

              Storage slots Has more storage slots
              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Samsung ST95

              Samsung ST95

              Ultra compact

              $170

              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Size Smaller
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690

              Travel zoom

              $221

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Longest exposure Significantly longer exposures
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Size Larger
              Casio Exilim EX-Z33

              Casio Exilim EX-Z33

              Ultra compact

              $90

              Weight Lighter
              Fastest shutter speed Faster max shutter speed
              Wide angle Much worse wide angle
              Image stabilization No image stabilization

              appearance

              Canon ELPH 100 HS Sony Cybershot DSC-W650
              Canon ELPH 100 HS Sony Cybershot DSC-W650
              Canon ELPH 100 HS Sony Cybershot DSC-W650

              discussion

              Canon ELPH 100 HS
              ELPH 100 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Sony Cybershot DSC-W650
              Cybershot DSC-W650
              Sony

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments