Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 vs Canon ELPH 100 HS

Tie
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

50

Canon ELPH 100 HS

49

Tie

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.5
High ISO
Light sensitivity
6,400 ISO
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 100 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact (93×56×20 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 100 HS.
Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Ultra compact

$120

Size Slightly smaller
Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Screen size Much smaller screen
Samsung WB200F

Samsung WB200F

Travel zoom

$179

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1

Compact

$120

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Wide angle Much worse wide angle

Canon ELPH 100 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Travel zoom

$171

Macro focus Better macro capability
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$105 - $119

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$199

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8
Lumix DMC-FH8
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 100 HS
ELPH 100 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments