Updated (September 2011): Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100 vs Canon ELPH 100 HS

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

56

Canon ELPH 100 HS

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
9.6 fps
Shoots RAW
Supports RAW
Better editing
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 100 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact (93×56×20 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
Weight
Light-weight
140 g
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 100 HS.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$403

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$498

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$449 - $535

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support

Canon ELPH 100 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Travel zoom

$99

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$119

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$275

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 100 HS
ELPH 100 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments