Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon ELPH 100 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

53

Canon ELPH 100 HS

50

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Light-weight
Weight
135 g
Large screen
Screen size
3"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 100 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact (93×56×20 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.8
Screen size
Large screen
3"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 100 HS.
Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$318

Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Size Slightly smaller
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$209

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Travel zoom

$119

Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon ELPH 100 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$119 - $130

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Travel zoom

$164

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$188 - $199

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 100 HS
ELPH 100 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments