Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon EOS 600D vs Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR vs Canon EOS 600D

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

41

Canon EOS 600D

38

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
320 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 600D

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 600D.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Size Much smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Super zoom

$550

3D Takes 3D photos
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Slightly larger
Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Super zoom

$525

3D Takes 3D photos
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Supports RAW No RAW support

Canon EOS 600D Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$470 - $649 body only

$549 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Overall image quality Slightly worse image quality
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$399 body only

$325 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Weight Lighter
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$294 body only

$400 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Overall image quality Better image quality
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR
FinePix HS20 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Canon EOS 600D
EOS 600D
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments