Canon EOS 600D vs Canon EOS 450D

Winner
Canon EOS 600D

113

Canon EOS 450D

84

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 600D

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 30fps
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,040k dots
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 450D

Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
400 ms startup delay
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
160 ms shutter lag
Size
Really small
Prosumer size (129×98×62 mm)
Thickness
Thin
2.4"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 600D.
Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 450D.

competitors

Canon EOS 600D Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$274 - $549 body only

$393 - $449 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Size Smaller
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Canon EOS 1200D

Canon EOS 1200D

Entry-level DSLR

$357 body only

$449 with 18-55mm lens

Size Smaller
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Canon EOS 700D

Canon EOS 700D

Entry-level DSLR

$1,281 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Lowest price Much more expensive

Canon EOS 450D Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5

Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,698 body only

$1,925 - $2,400 with 12-60mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Viewfinder Has a digital viewfinder
Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100

Entry-level DSLR

$329 body only

$533 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
True resolution Higher true resolution
Thickness Much thicker
Canon EOS 30D

Canon EOS 30D

Entry-level DSLR

$264 body only

Viewfinder Has a pentaprism viewfinder
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Canon EOS 600D
EOS 600D
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS 450D
EOS 450D
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments