Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Canon ELPH 510 HS

Tie
Canon ELPH 300 HS

50

Canon ELPH 510 HS

49

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 300 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 510 HS

Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 14 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 510 HS.
Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 300 HS.

competitors

Canon ELPH 300 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Compact

$275

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$119

Zoom More zoom
Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$135 - $199

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon ELPH 510 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$199 - $209

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Weight Significantly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Pro DSLR

$5,999 body only

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Much longer battery life
Size Much larger
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$279 body only

$448 with 16-50mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Battery life Much longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon ELPH 300 HS
ELPH 300 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 510 HS
ELPH 510 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments