Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs Canon ELPH 510 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

55

Canon ELPH 510 HS

52

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Super compact (93×57×20 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 510 HS

Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×22 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 14 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 510 HS.
Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Waterproof

$300

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$225

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX110 IS

Canon PowerShot SX110 IS

Travel zoom

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Wide angle Much worse wide angle

Canon ELPH 510 HS Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$279

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$149

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Weight Lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Travel zoom

$199

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Touch screen No touch screen

discussion

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 510 HS
ELPH 510 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments