Updated (February, 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

61

vs

Canon ELPH 300 HS

59

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Runner-up
     

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 320 HS

Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Less buttons
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 300 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 

differences

Advantages of the Canon 320 HS

Report a correction
Screen size
Significantly larger screen
3.2" vs 2.7"
Help
Around 20% larger screen
Touch screen
Has a touch screen
Yes vs No
Help
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus
Screen resolution
Higher resolution screen
461k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Lowest price
Slightly cheaper
$159.00 vs $229.87
Help
The best price we've seen is $71 cheaper (more than 30% less)
Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS Learn more about
the Canon 320 HS

Advantages of the Canon 300 HS

Report a correction
Size
Slightly smaller
92x55x19 mm vs 94x57x21 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Continuous shooting
Shoots slightly faster
3.4 fps vs 2 fps
Help
70% faster continuous shooting
Thickness
Slightly thinner
0.8" vs 0.8"
Help
Around 10% thinner
Canon ELPH 300 HS Learn more about
the Canon 300 HS
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS Canon ELPH 320 HS 61
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        59 Canon ELPH 300 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths
              Supports 24p Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Help
              For that film look
              Size Fairly small Help
              320 HS:94x57x21 mm
              300 HS:92x55x19 mm
              High-speed framerate Very high speed movies Help
              240 fps
              Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
              Lens
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Thickness Thin Help
              0.8"
              Weight Light weight Help
              320 HS:145 g
              300 HS:141 g
              Common Weaknesses
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              320 HS:2 fps
              300 HS:3.4 fps
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              5x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Travel zoom

              $149

              Zoom Has slightly more zoom
              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Supports 24p Doesn't record movies in 24p
              Size Is slightly larger
              Canon ELPH 520 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

              Ultra compact

              $150 - $189

              Zoom Has slightly more zoom
              Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Compact

              $239

              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Travel zoom

              $586

              Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
              Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
              Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Travel zoom

              $244

              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Battery life Has a slightly longer battery life
              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
              Canon Powershot S100

              Canon Powershot S100

              Pro digicam

              $245 - $400

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              True resolution Takes slightly higher resolution photos
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Canon PowerShot S120

              Canon PowerShot S120

              Pro digicam

              $391 - $399

              Aperture Has a significantly wider aperture
              Screen resolution Has a significantly higher resolution screen
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon ELPH 530 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

              Ultra compact

              $179 - $289

              Zoom More zoom
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Wide angle Worse wide angle

              Canon ELPH 300 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              No significant competitors found that are specific to the Canon ELPH 300 HS.

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS Canon ELPH 300 HS

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
              ELPH 320 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Canon ELPH 300 HS
              ELPH 300 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments