Updated (February, 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

vs

Canon ELPH 310 HS

54

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.6
Light sensitivity
High ISO
12,800 ISO
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 310 HS

Screen size
Large screen
3.0"
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Macro focus
Great macro
1 cm
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon 310 HS

Report a correction
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies 240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Screen size Larger screen 3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Macro focus Significantly better macro capability 1 cm vs 5 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 5x closer to the lens
Zoom Slightly more zoom 8x vs 5x
Help
More than 2.5x more zoom
Longest exposure Longer exposures 15s vs 4s
Help
Around 4x longer exposures
Canon ELPH 310 HS Learn more about
the Canon 310 HS

Advantages of the Sony WX50

Report a correction
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The WX50's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Aperture Wider aperture f/2.6 vs f/3.0
Help
At its widest zoom, the WX50's lens captures marginally more light (0.4 f-stops)
HDR Has in-camera HDR Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Wide angle Better wide angle 25 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Size Smaller 92x52x19 mm vs 96x57x22 mm
Help
More than 20% smaller
Battery life Longer battery life 240 shots vs 210 shots
Help
More than 10% more shots per battery charge
Weight Lighter 117 g vs 140 g
Help
Around 20% lighter
Thickness Thinner 0.7" vs 0.9"
Help
More than 10% thinner
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster 10 fps vs 8.7 fps
Help
More than 10% faster continuous shooting
Lowest price Cheaper $169.00 vs $284.98
Help
The best price we've seen is $116 cheaper (more than 40% less)
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 Learn more about
the Sony WX50
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon ELPH 310 HS Canon ELPH 310 HS 54
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        66 Sony Cyber-shot WX50 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Size Fairly small Help
              310 HS:96x57x22 mm
              WX50:92x52x19 mm
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Thickness Thin Help
              310 HS:0.9"
              WX50:0.7"
              Weight Light weight Help
              310 HS:140 g
              WX50:117 g
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Travel zoom

              $179 - $204

              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Size Is slightly larger
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150

              Travel zoom

              $183

              Longest exposure Slightly longer exposures
              Size Is slightly larger
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Compact

              $200

              Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Compact

              $130

              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Continuous shooting Doesn't shoot as fast continuously
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Travel zoom

              $129 - $167

              Thickness Is thicker
              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              Sony Cybershot DSC-WX200

              Sony Cybershot DSC-WX200

              Travel zoom

              $305

              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Nikon Coolpix S6300

              Nikon Coolpix S6300

              Travel zoom

              $180

              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier

              Canon ELPH 310 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

              Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

              Digicam

              $180 - $250

              Lowest price Cheaper
              Size Much larger
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

              Canon ELPH 320 HS

              Compact

              $164 - $170

              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Wide angle Better wide angle
              Continuous shooting Shoots slower
              Macro focus Worse macro capability
              Canon ELPH 510 HS

              Canon ELPH 510 HS

              Travel zoom

              $171

              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Screen size Larger screen
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Aperture Narrower aperture

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Travel zoom

              $134 - $148

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Lowest price Slightly cheaper
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
              Sony Cybershot WX60

              Sony Cybershot WX60

              Travel zoom

              $215

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

              Ultra compact

              $100

              Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Travel zoom

              $118 - $128

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Lowest price Slightly cheaper
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

              Travel zoom

              $278

              Zoom Significantly more zoom
              Screen size Larger screen
              Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos

              appearance

              Canon ELPH 310 HS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
              Canon ELPH 310 HS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
              Canon ELPH 310 HS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

              discussion

              Canon ELPH 310 HS
              ELPH 310 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
              Cyber-shot WX50
              Sony

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments