Updated (February 2012): Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs Canon ELPH 310 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

59

Canon ELPH 310 HS

48

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
Really small
Size
Compact (106×61×33 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 310 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact (96×57×22 mm)
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
8.7 fps
Thickness
Thin
0.9"
Weight
Light-weight
140 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Canon ELPH 310 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Travel zoom

Battery life Longer battery life
Weight Slightly lighter
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Much longer battery life
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$251 - $349

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
GPS No built-in GPS

Canon ELPH 310 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$438 body only

Battery life Much longer battery life
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$199

GPS Has a GPS
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
PowerShot SX260 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 310 HS
ELPH 310 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments