Updated (February, 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs Canon ELPH 520 HS

vs
Canon ELPH 310 HS

53

Canon ELPH 310 HS
Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Size
 Really small
Ultra compact 87x54x19 mm
Supports 24p
 24p movies
For that film look
Macro focus
 Great macro
1 cm
Thickness
 Thin
0.7"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 310 HS

Supports 24p
 24p movies
For that film look
Continuous shooting
 Rapid fire
8.7 fps
Macro focus
 Great macro
1 cm
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon 310 HS

 Report a correction
Aperture Wider aperture f/3.0 vs f/3.4
Help
 At its widest zoom, the 310 HS's lens captures marginally more light (0.4 f-stops)
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 8.7 fps vs 2.8 fps
Help
 More than 3x faster continuous shooting
Battery life Slightly longer battery life 210 shots vs 190 shots
Help
 More than 10% more shots per battery charge
Weight Lighter 140 g vs 155 g
Help
 Around 10% lighter
Canon ELPH 310 HS Learn more about
the Canon 310 HS

Advantages of the Canon ELPH 520 HS

 Report a correction
Zoom More zoom 12x vs 8x
Help
 Around 2.5x more zoom
Size Smaller 87x54x19 mm vs 96x57x22 mm
Help
 Around 30% smaller
Thickness Thinner 0.7" vs 0.9"
Help
 More than 10% thinner
Lowest price Cheaper $109.00 vs $179.00
Help
 The best price we've seen is $70 cheaper (around 40% less)
Canon ELPH 520 HS Learn more about
the Canon ELPH 520 HS
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent travel zooms, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon ELPH 310 HS Canon ELPH 310 HS 53
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs
        58 Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Supports 24p Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Help
              For that film look
              High-speed framerate Very high speed movies Help
              240 fps
              Size Fairly small Help
              310 HS:96x57x22 mm
              ELPH 520 HS:87x54x19 mm
              Macro focus Good macro capabilities Help
              1 cm
              Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
              310 HS:Lens, Sensor shift
              ELPH 520 HS:Lens
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Thickness Thin Help
              310 HS:0.9"
              ELPH 520 HS:0.7"
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Battery life Few shots per battery charge Help
              310 HS:210 shots
              ELPH 520 HS:190 shots
              3D Neither camera can take 3D photos Help
              No 3d support
              Wide angle Poor wide angle Help
              28 mm

              Compared to recent travel zooms

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Weight Light weight Help
              310 HS:140 g
              ELPH 520 HS:155 g
              Touch screen No touchscreens Help
              More buttons
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              310 HS:8x
              ELPH 520 HS:12x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages
              Canon ELPH 530 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

              Ultra compact

              $120
              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Compare the PowerShot ELPH 530 HS vs the ELPH 310 HS
              Compare the PowerShot ELPH 530 HS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
              Canon ELPH 330 HS

              Canon ELPH 330 HS

              Travel zoom

              $197
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
              Thickness Is thicker
              Size Is slightly larger
              Compare the ELPH 330 HS vs the ELPH 310 HS
              Compare the ELPH 330 HS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

              Canon ELPH 320 HS

              Compact

              $138 - $250
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Compare the ELPH 320 HS vs the ELPH 310 HS
              Compare the ELPH 320 HS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              Compact

              $187
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Compare the PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs the ELPH 310 HS
              Compare the PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Compact

              $165
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Screen size Has a slightly smaller screen
              Compare the ELPH 300 HS vs the ELPH 310 HS
              Compare the ELPH 300 HS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
              Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

              Travel zoom

              $199 - $200
              Zoom Has significantly more zoom
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker
              Compare the PowerShot SX280 HS vs the ELPH 310 HS
              Compare the PowerShot SX280 HS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Travel zoom

              $148 - $191
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Light sensitivity Much higher maximum light sensitivity
              Longest exposure Slightly shorter exposures
              Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing
              Compare the Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 vs the ELPH 310 HS
              Compare the Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

              Canon ELPH 310 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages
              Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

              Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

              Digicam

              $250 - $300
              Size Much larger
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              Compare the Z2300 Instant Digital Camera vs the ELPH 310 HS

              Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

              Travel zoom

              $109
              Aperture Wider aperture
              Weight Lighter
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Compare the PowerShot ELPH 130 IS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

              appearance

              Canon ELPH 310 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS
              Canon ELPH 310 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS
              Canon ELPH 310 HS Canon ELPH 520 HS

              discussion

              Canon ELPH 310 HS
              ELPH 310 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Canon ELPH 520 HS
              PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments