Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS vs Canon ELPH 310 HS

Tie
Canon ELPH 520 HS

43

Canon ELPH 310 HS

41

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Really small
Size
Ultra compact (87×54×19 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 310 HS

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
8.7 fps
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
  2. Sensor shift
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Canon ELPH 310 HS.
Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 520 HS.

competitors

Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

Canon ELPH 530 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Ultra compact

$214

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Thickness Slightly thicker
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Travel zoom

$169

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$119

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon ELPH 310 HS Competitors

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Digicam

$100

Lowest price Significantly cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$209

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Travel zoom

$119

Size Slightly smaller
Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon ELPH 520 HS
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 310 HS
ELPH 310 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments