Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS vs Canon ELPH 310 HS

Tie
Canon ELPH 520 HS

35
Canon ELPH 310 HS

34

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Really small
Size
Ultra compact (87×54×19 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 24fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 310 HS

Movie format
 Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Weight
 Light-weight
140 g
Size
 Really small
Super compact (96×57×22 mm)
High-speed framerate
 High speed movies
240 fps
More detailed differences and similarities →

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Canon ELPH 310 HS.
Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 520 HS.

competitors

Canon ELPH 520 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Compact

$190

Aperture Wider aperture
Weight Slightly lighter
Zoom Much less zoom
Compare the PowerShot SD1300 IS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$320 - $429

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Size Much larger
Compare the PowerShot SX60 HS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Travel zoom

$425

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Much larger
Compare the PowerShot SX700 HS vs the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS Competitors

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100

Compact

$110

Wide angle Better wide angle
Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Much less zoom
Compare the Coolpix A100 vs the ELPH 310 HS
Placeholder

Olympus D-425

Compact

Zoom Much less zoom
Compare the D-425 vs the ELPH 310 HS
Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Compact

$221

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Zoom Much less zoom
Compare the ELPH 320 HS vs the ELPH 310 HS
More detailed differences and similarities →

discussion

Canon ELPH 520 HS
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 310 HS
ELPH 310 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments

More detailed differences and similarities →