Updated (August 2011): Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Canon ELPH 310 HS

Winner
Canon ELPH 300 HS

51

Canon ELPH 310 HS

48

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 300 HS

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 24fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 310 HS

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
8.7 fps
Weight
Light-weight
140 g
Size
Really small
Super compact (96×57×22 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Canon ELPH 310 HS.
Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 300 HS.

competitors

Canon ELPH 300 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Travel zoom

$230

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Compact

$270

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger
Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Compact

$163

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Lowest price Cheaper
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

Canon ELPH 310 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Compact

$249

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Digicam

$95 - $99

Lowest price Cheaper
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Compact

$251

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Continuous shooting Shoots slower

discussion

Canon ELPH 300 HS
ELPH 300 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 310 HS
ELPH 310 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Avatar for Tirah Misu Tirah Misu (7:51 AM, January 09, 2012)
i have the 300HS and i think you should keep it instead.  the 24mm is better than 28mm on the 310.  also aperture of f 2.7 is better than f 3.0 on 310.  the 300 is cheaper too!
 
Avatar for DL DL (5:14 PM, January 02, 2012)
Help! I have both the 310 and 300 and must return one today. I'm hard on equipment and am traveling, want sturdy with great image potential (the film part isn't that interesting to me).