Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

vs

Canon ELPH 310 HS

54

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 310 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon 310 HS

Report a correction
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 8.7 fps vs 2 fps
Help
Around 4.5x faster continuous shooting
Macro focus Better macro capability 1 cm vs 3 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 3x closer to the lens
Battery life Longer battery life 210 shots vs 170 shots
Help
More than 20% more shots per battery charge
Zoom Slightly more zoom 8x vs 5x
Help
More than 2.5x more zoom
Canon ELPH 310 HS Learn more about
the Canon 310 HS

Advantages of the Canon ELPH 110 HS

Report a correction
Wide angle Better wide angle 24 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Aperture Wider aperture f/2.7 vs f/3.0
Help
At its widest zoom, the ELPH 110 HS's lens captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops)
Size Slightly smaller 93x57x20 mm vs 96x57x22 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner 0.8" vs 0.9"
Help
Around 10% thinner
Lowest price Cheaper $199.85 vs $284.98
Help
The best price we've seen is $85 cheaper (around 30% less)
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Learn more about
the Canon ELPH 110 HS
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon ELPH 310 HS Canon ELPH 310 HS 54
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        61 Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Supports 24p Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Help
              For that film look
              Size Fairly small Help
              310 HS:96x57x22 mm
              ELPH 110 HS:93x57x20 mm
              High-speed framerate Very high speed movies Help
              240 fps
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Thickness Thin Help
              310 HS:0.9"
              ELPH 110 HS:0.8"
              Weight Light weight Help
              310 HS:140 g
              ELPH 110 HS:135 g
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Battery life Few shots per battery charge Help
              310 HS:210 shots
              ELPH 110 HS:170 shots

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Travel zoom

              $179 - $204

              Supports 24p Doesn't record movies in 24p
              Aperture Has a significantly narrower aperture
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

              Canon ELPH 320 HS

              Compact

              $165 - $170

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Travel zoom

              $129 - $167

              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              Supports 24p Doesn't record movies in 24p
              Canon ELPH 510 HS

              Canon ELPH 510 HS

              Travel zoom

              $171

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Weight Is significantly heavier
              Supports 24p Doesn't record movies in 24p
              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Canon ELPH 300 HS

              Compact

              $235

              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Screen size Has a slightly smaller screen
              Canon Powershot S100

              Canon Powershot S100

              Pro digicam

              $282

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              True resolution Takes slightly higher resolution photos
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Travel zoom

              $241

              Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity

              Canon ELPH 310 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

              Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

              Digicam

              $180 - $249

              Lowest price Cheaper
              Size Much larger
              Image stabilization No image stabilization

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon ELPH 100 HS

              Canon ELPH 100 HS

              Compact

              Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

              appearance

              Canon ELPH 310 HS Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              Canon ELPH 310 HS Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              Canon ELPH 310 HS Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

              discussion

              Canon ELPH 310 HS
              ELPH 310 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments