Updated (August 2011): Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS vs Canon ELPH 310 HS

Tie
Canon ELPH 100 HS

50

Canon ELPH 310 HS

48

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 100 HS

Really small
Size
Super compact (93×56×20 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Canon ELPH 310 HS

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
8.7 fps
Size
Really small
Super compact (96×57×22 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
  2. Sensor shift

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Canon ELPH 310 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 100 HS.

competitors

Canon ELPH 100 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$108 - $130

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$180 - $209

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$300

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Screen size Much smaller screen

Canon ELPH 310 HS Competitors

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Digicam

$100

Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$108 - $130

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$300

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Wider aperture
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Canon ELPH 100 HS
ELPH 100 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon ELPH 310 HS
ELPH 310 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments